Register | Log in | FAQ      [?] 

Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance

Articles from the last few issues of Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance © Taylor and Francis Ltd
  • Introduction: Accountability in Neuroethics
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 205-208.
    posted by 1 person applebyb
  • The Issue of Consent in Research that Administers Drugs of Addiction to Addicted Persons
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 209-225.
  • Disclosure Issues in Neuroscience Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 226-241.
  • Incidental Findings: A Common Law Approach
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 242-261.
  • What a Tangled Web We Weave: Ethical and Legal Implications of Deception in Recruitment
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 262-282.
  • Perspectives on Engaging the Public in the Ethics of Emerging Biotechnologies: From Salmon to Biobanks to Neuroethics
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 283-302.
  • Biomedical Research and the Commercialization Agenda: A Review of main Considerations for Neuroscience
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 4. (October 2008), pp. 303-320.
  • The Therapeutic Misconception: A Threat to Valid Parental Consent for Pediatric Neuroimaging Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 3. (July 2008), pp. 133-151.
  • Industry-Sponsored Ghostwriting in Clinical Trial Reporting: A Case Study
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 3. (July 2008), pp. 152-167.
  • Clinical Trials of Drugs Used Off-Label in Neonates: Ethical Issues and Alternative Study Designs
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 3. (July 2008), pp. 168-187.
  • The Expanding Purview: Institutional Review Boards and the Review of Human Subjects Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 15, No. 3. (July 2008), pp. 188-204.
  • EPA's 2006 Human-Subjects Rule for Pesticide Experiments
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 14, No. 4. (October 2007), pp. 211-254.
  • Offering Results to Research Subjects: U.S. Institutional Review Board Policy
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 14, No. 4. (October 2007), pp. 255-267.
  • Authorship and Publication Practices: Evaluation of the Effect of Responsible Conduct of Research Instruction to Postdoctoral Trainees
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 14, No. 4. (October 2007), pp. 269-305.
  • Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research: An Argument for National Research Review
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 3. (September 2006), pp. 207-224.
    by Francoise Baylis, Scott Robert, N Jaso
    posted by 1 person jolaskool
  • Research Misconduct and The Scientific process: Continuing Quality Improvement
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 3. (September 2006), pp. 225-246.
    posted by 1 person lilith
  • Research Misconduct Policies of High Impact Biomedical Journals***
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 3. (September 2006), pp. 247-258.
    by Barbara Redman, Jon Merz
  • Deception in Psychology: Moral Costs and Benefits of Unsought Self-Knowledge
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 3. (September 2006), pp. 259-275.
    by Lisa Bortolotti, Matteo Mameli
  • Two Facets of Peer Review and the Proper Role of Study Sections
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 3. (September 2006), pp. 277-283.
    by John Lenard
  • Are You Sitting Comfortably? Perspectives of the Researchers and the Researched on Being Comfortable
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 111-133.
  • A Qualitative Study of Non-Affiliated, Non-Scientist Institutional Review Board Members
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 135-155.
  • Research Subjects with Limited English Proficiency: Ethical and Legal Issues
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 157-177.
  • Assessing the Seriousness of Research Misconduct: Considerations for Sanction Assignment
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 2. (June 2006), pp. 179-205.
    by Lisa Keranen
  • Introduction to Special Issue of Accountability in Research on the Review and Approval of Biomedical Research Proposals: A Call for a Centralized National Human Research Protections System
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 1-9.
    by Howard Mann, Adil Shamoo
  • Reforming the Oversight of Multi-Site Clinical Research: A Review of Two Possible Solutions
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 11-24.
    by Kristin Nowak, Elizabeth Bankert, Robert Nelson
  • Concept Paper: A Virtual Centralized IRB System
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 25-45.
    by Rita Mcwilliams, Carl Hebden, Adele Gilpin
  • Centralized and Non-Centralized Ethics Review: A Five Nation Study
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 47-74.
    by Maureen Fitzgerald, Paul Phillips
  • The Canadian Agency for the Oversight of Research Involving Humans: A Reform Proposal
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 75-100.
    by Jocelyn Downie
  • Commentary: Fraudulent Human Embryonic Stem Cell Research in South Korea: Lessons Learned
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 13, No. 1. (March 2006), pp. 101-109.
    by David Resnik, Adil Shamoo, Sheldon Krimsky
  • The Scientific Misconduct QuestionnaireRevised (SMQ-R): Validation and Psychometric Testing
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 4. (December 2005), pp. 263-280.
    by Marion Broome, Erica Pryor, Barbara Habermann, Leavonne Pulley, Harold Kincaid
    posted by 1 person JudieMayne
  • Assessing Commercial Feasibility: A Practical and Ethical Prerequisite for Human Clinical Testing
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 4. (December 2005), pp. 281-297.
    by Dwayne Kirk, Scott
  • Rating Methodological Quality: Toward Improved Assessment and Investigation
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 4. (December 2005), pp. 299-313.
    by Anne Moyer, John Finney
  • Evaluating the Oversight of Scientific Misconduct
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 157-162.
    by Barbara Redman, Jon Merz
  • Researchers' Views of the Acceptability of Restrictive Provisions in Clinical Trial Agreements with Industry Sponsors
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 163-191.
    by Michelle Mello, Brian Clarridge, Studdert
  • Awareness of Publication Guidelines and the Responsible Conduct of Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 193-206.
    by Kirsten Barrett, Carolyn Funk, Francis Macrina
  • Assessing the Educational Literature in the Responsible Conduct of Research for Core Content
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 207-224.
    by Elizabeth Heitman, Ellen
    posted by 1 person cbsmith
  • Research Misconduct and Crime Lessons from Criminal Science on Preventing Misconduct and Promoting Integrity
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 225-240.
    by Douglas Adams, Kenneth Pimple
  • Evaluating research misconduct policies at major research universities: A pilot study
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 3. (September 2005), pp. 241-262.
    by Ann
  • Research on Environmental Health Interventions: Ethical Problems and Solutions
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 69-102.
    by David Resnik, Darryl Zeldin, Richard Sharp
  • Haunted Manuscripts: Ghost Authorship in the Medical Literature
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 103-114.
    by Stephanie Ngai, Jennifer L Gold, Sudeep S Gill, Paula A Rochon
  • Reactions to Research Participation in Vulnerable Subgroups
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 115-138.
    by Cathy SPATZ Widom, Sally J Czaja
  • Ten Steps to Developing a National Agenda to Address Financial Conflicts of Interest in Industry Sponsored Clinical Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 2. (June 2005), pp. 139-155.
    by Patricia Tereskerz, Jonathan Moreno
  • DISSEMINATION TO RESEARCH SUBJECTS: OPERATIONALIZING INVESTIGATOR ACCOUNTABILITY
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 1. (March 2005), pp. 1-16.
    by Randi Shaul, Lynette Reid, Beverley Essue, Julie Gibson, Velma Marzinotto, Denis Daneman
  • DO PEER GUIDELINES OR EDITORIAL POLICIES AFFECT THE REPORTING AND DISCUSSION OF RACE AND ETHNICITY IN PEDIATRIC RESEARCH?
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 1. (March 2005), pp. 17-31.
    by Paul Ackerman, Michael Kelly, Catherine Walsh, Lainie F Ross
  • EXCLUDING PARTICULAR INFORMATION FROM CONSENT FORMS
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 1. (March 2005), pp. 33-45.
    by Neal Dickert, Nancy Kass, Michael Paasche-Orlow, Holly Taylor
  • CLINICAL TRIALS LITIGATION: PRACTICAL REALITIES AS SEEN FROM THE TRENCHES
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 12, No. 1. (March 2005), pp. 47-67.
    by Haavi Morreim
  • Introduction to Special Issue of Accountability in Research on Conflict of Interest in Science
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 11, No. 2., 79.
    by Sheldon Krimsky
  • Conflicts of Interest in Academic Research: Policies, Processes, and Attitudes
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 11, No. 2., 83.
    by Shira Lipton, Elizabeth Boyd, Lisa Bero
  • Institutional Academic Industry Relationship: Results of Interviews with University Leaders
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 11, No. 2., 103.
    by Eric Campbell, Beverly Moy, Sandra Feibelmann, Joel Weissman, David Blumenthal
  • Ethical Challenges to the Integrity of Physicans: Financial Conflicts of Interest in Clinical Research
    Accountability in Research: Policies and Quality Assurance, Vol. 11, No. 2., 119.
    by Antal Solyom
  • Note: You may cite this page as: http://www.citeulike.org/journal/tandf-gacr

    Result page: 1 2 Next RIS BibTeX
    CiteULike organises scholarly (or academic) papers or literature and provides bibliographic (which means it makes bibliographies) for universities and higher education establishments. It helps undergraduates and postgraduates. People studying for PhDs or in postdoctoral (postdoc) positions. The service is similar in scope to EndNote or RefWorks or any other reference manager like BibTeX, but it is a social bookmarking service for scientists and humanities researchers.